Growing 1981 Larry Rivers [top] Online

Its influence can be seen in the work of later artists like John Currin (in the distorted flesh tones) and even in the melancholic self-portraits of Alice Neel, though Neel was Rivers’ contemporary. What makes Growing unique is its refusal to be beautiful. It is ugly in the way that a biopsy is ugly—revealing the truth beneath the skin.

Information is available regarding Larry Rivers' broader impact on the Pop Art movement or his notable collaborations with members of the New York School of poets if that is of interest. The Crimes Against Thérèse Blanchard - Carolyn Gage

The devastating impact of Growing on his children has only become fully public in the years since Rivers's death in 2002. Rivers's youngest daughter, Emma Rivers Tamburlini, has been the most outspoken, stating that the project was nothing less than an act of betrayal and exploitation. In a 2010 article for Vanity Fair , she declared her father guilty of creating child pornography, using her and her sister as unwilling subjects to serve his own artistic and voyeuristic interests. She noted the years of torment she endured as a result of her father's actions, stating that she sees him not as a rose among thorns, but "as another thorn". Her older sister, Gwynne, has also spoken of the lingering hurt and anger, telling a reporter years later at a museum opening that the memory of the filming has haunted her since she was a pre-adolescent. While the sisters have said Rivers never touched them inappropriately, they describe the experience as profoundly traumatizing and a violation of the father-child relationship.

Works that explicitly deal with figurative narrative and identity—hallmarks of Rivers’ legacy—perform significantly better than his purely decorative exercises. The Enduring Legacy of Larry Rivers growing 1981 larry rivers

Even more damning than the film's content was the testimony of the subjects themselves. Emma Tamburlini, Rivers' younger daughter, became the public face of the scandal. She did not defend her father's work; she condemned it.

This public link is valid for 7 days and shares a thread, including any personal information you added. This link or copies made by others cannot be deleted. If you share with third parties, their policies apply. Can’t copy the link right now. Try again later.

The title is ironic and earnest in equal measure. Growing captures a moment of arrested expansion: tendrils reach outward, leaves overlap, yet the entire scene feels suspended between vigorous life and decay. A few lower leaves are daubed with brownish-yellow, as if spotted with age or disease. Rivers seems less interested in botanical accuracy than in using the plant as a metaphor for the artist’s own late-career productivity—persistent, messy, still reaching. Its influence can be seen in the work

In 1981, the American artist Larry Rivers completed a 45-minute documentary film titled While Rivers was a celebrated "Godfather of Pop Art" known for his rebellious and innovative style, this specific project remains one of the most controversial and unsettling chapters of his career. The Project’s Origin

Tamburlini told the New York Times that she felt "very uncomfortable" being filmed and that the entire experience had a profoundly negative impact on her life, contributing to her developing . Her statement to the Times was stark: "It wrecked a lot of my life actually". She later explained that her father "coerced them into doing it" and that she was uncomfortable with the way her body was being documented without her true consent.

The Growing series (1976–1981) remains one of the most polarizing entries in Larry Rivers' career. It stands as a complex artifact from an era of the New York art scene where the boundaries of the "private" were frequently challenged. Whether analyzed as a raw attempt at documenting human maturation or criticized as an exploitative misuse of paternal authority, the work necessitates a serious examination of the intersections of artistic freedom, the ethics of consent, and the responsibilities of the artist toward their subjects. In a 2010 article for Vanity Fair ,

In this article, we explore the Growing series (1981), its context within Rivers’ career, the artistic and ethical questions it raises, and its legacy in contemporary art discussions.

True to the title, Rivers intersperses painted and collaged images of plants, vines, and root systems. However, these are not delicate flowers. The roots look like arteries; the vines wrap around the figure’s limbs like constraints. One section of the canvas features a blown-up, Xeroxed image of a tree ring—a direct symbol of biological "growing" that doubles as a bullseye for time.

Larry Rivers, a figure often associated with the transition from Abstract Expressionism to Pop Art, was known for using his personal life as primary source material. In the mid-1970s, this inclination took a turn that would later be heavily scrutinized.

This long article explores the world of Larry Rivers in 1981, the year of the film's completion. It examines his storied career, the film's unsettling creation, the public scandal it spawned, the legal gray area it exposed, and the painful question it forces upon us: can we separate the art from the artist?